I have found that the system is also limited to only natural language, so constructed languages such as Loglan or Lojban are ignored. Pre-determined phrases reject the notion of an adaptable system. Vissel parses the received input from a user into pre-determined phrases. 7,089,218 to Visel (2006) discloses the method of emulating the human brain with thought and rationalization processes, as well as a method for storing human-like thought. “Being human” has its' limits as humans are not completely unique and non-human species are discovered to have similar reasoning abilities (perhaps not as advance, great apes), the ability to interact (dogs), and the capacity to remember (elephants). Throughout the document, “artificial intelligence”, “AI”, “system”, and “entity” may be interchanged to best convey the intent. I have found that attempts at creating a true artificial intelligence would fail, because they only allow for the input of information before the program responds. However, the concepts have not been able to be implemented neither at a brain-level scale nor as a capability of truly sentient/sapient artificial intelligence. While the concepts were limited, they performed relatively well in their niches. These bio-mimetic or biologically-inspired concepts have resulted in branches called expert systems, neural networks, hive computing, fuzzy logic, among others. Scientists attempted to recreate the human mind, memory storage, human interaction, and generally, what was defined as “being human.” Many of these attempts were bio-mimetic-that is, they were suggested by the underlying human biological elements of the human brain. Originally, the concept of a sentient or sapient artificial intelligence was of science fiction novels and videos. Patent Number Issue Date Patentee 7,089,218 2006 Aug. The following is tabulation on some prior art that presently appears relevant: U.S. At this point, all we can claim is that domestic dogs are almost incredibly well attuned to the niche of serving humans.This invention generally relates to an artificial intelligence, specifically an artificial intelligence entity that is sentient or sapient. Looking into the reasons why dogs might seem smart but possibly not sentient, Psychology Today reasoned, “Much as we might wish to believe that man’s best friend is self-aware, there is no good supportive evidence as yet, although this may reflect problems with the tests. One theory about why dogs fail at the mirror test is that they’re animals that rely heavily on their senses of smell and hearing. The test, originally developed by Gordon Gallup, involves watching to see if an animal can recognize itself in a mirror.Īfter researching a range of animals, Gallup found that chimpanzees, magpies, and dolphins were among the animals that could recognize their own reflections, but that dogs and gorillas did not. Are dogs as self-aware as we are?īalancing out Berns’s study, dogs have traditionally failed at the standard psychological test for self-awareness. But humans have a level of sentience that not many other species share in the form of self-awareness. (Picture Credit: Ivan Pantic/Getty Images)ĭogs may have the ability to feel emotions similarly to the way we do.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |